Data analysis for the project hambiDoubleEvo

Authors
Affiliations

Shane L Hogle

Julius Hoffmann

Published

March 11, 2025

Abstract
Evolutionary change within community members and shifts in species composition via species sorting contribute to community and trait dynamics. However, we do not understand when and how both processes contribute to community dynamics. Here, we estimated the contributions of species sorting and evolution over time (60 days) in bacterial communities of 24 species under selection by a ciliate predator. We found that species sorting contributed to increased community carrying capacity, while evolution contributed to decreased anti-predator defences. The relative roles of both processes changed over time, and our analysis indicates that if initial trait variation was in the direction of selection, species sorting prevailed, otherwise evolution drove phenotypic change. Furthermore, community composition, population densities and genomic evolution were affected by phenotypic match–mismatch combinations of predator and prey evolutionary history. Overall, our findings help to integrate when and how ecological and evolutionary processes structure communities.
Keywords

Microbiology, Ecology, Evolution, Predator-prey

1 Records:

‡ equal contribution, ◇ Corresponding author and equal contribution

1.1 Published record

Temporal changes in the role of species sorting and evolution determine community dynamics.
Hoffman J, Hogle SL, Hiltunen T, Becks L. Ecology Letters (2025) DOI:10.1111/ele.70033

1.2 Preprint

Temporal changes in the role of species sorting and evolution determine community dynamics.
Hoffman J, Hogle SL, Hiltunen T, Becks L. Research Square (2024) DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4647074/v1

1.3 Code and data archive:

An archived release of the code here is available from Zenodo: DOI

2 Experiment overview

This project is a collaboration between teams at University of Turku in Finland and the University of Konstanz in Germany. The repo contains data from an experiment investigating the relative roles of ecology and evolution in an multitrophic synthetic microbial ecosystem. 24 HAMBI bacterial species were individually grown and coevolved for 100 days (3% vol transfer every 4 days) with the generalist bacterivore Tetrahymena thermophila to generate 6 (replicates A-F) x 24 (species) coevolved bacterial and ciliate populations. Bacteria and ciliates were separated from the coevolution cocultures and bacteria made axenic via freeze-thaw. The 24 predator-coevolved bacterial species were pooled in equal proportions into a “coevolved” prey inoculum. Evolved phenotypically variable ciliates were taken from a 3 year long coevolution experiment (see Cairns 2018, Hogle 2022 Ecol Lett, Hogle 2022 ISME J) and were combined in equal proportions into a “Evolved” predator inoculum. Finally, the 24 clonal/ancestral bacterial species were pooled in equal proportions into a “ancestral” prey incolum and the ancestral Tetrahymena was used as the “ancestral” predator incolum. The inocula were used to start a serial transfer experiment in a full factorial design in six biological replicates (anc prey + anc pred, anc prey + evo pred, evo prey + anc pred, evo prey + evo pred). A no-predator treatment was also used (anc prey + no pred, evo prey + no pred). These evolutionary treatments were serially passaged every 48 hours (30% transfer - 1800 μl to 4.2mL fresh 5% KB medium). The serial transfer microcosms were grown for 60 days after which the experiment was terminated.

3 Measurements and data types

There are many different types of data collected. However, not all data types were collected for all treatment combinations.

  • Bacterial density (OD600) measured from replicates A-F in all treatment combinations at days 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60
  • Ciliate density (cells/ml) measured from replicates A-F in all treatment combinations at days 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60
  • Bacterial species frequencies (amplicon counts) were measured from replicates A, C, and E at days 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60
  • Bacterial species frequencies (amplicon counts) were measured from the “ancestral” and “evolved” inocula used to start the experiment (called “init”). Note this is not measurement from the actual experiment at T0, but a measurement of the inocula.
  • Whole genome sequencing data (wgs) for all ancestral/clonal bacterial species (24 total)
  • Whole genome sequencing data (wgs) for each coevolved bacterial species population used to inoculate replicates A,C, E (3 x 24 = 72 total).
  • Metagenome sequencing data from all evolution treatment combinations, excluding the no predator control conditions (anc prey + no pred, evo prey + no pred) from replicates A, C, E and on days 8, 28, and 60.
  • Initial defense traits (resistance to ciliate grazing) were measured by XYZ for:
    • All 24 ancestral bacterial species
    • All 24 co-evolved bacterial populations
  • Evolved defense traits (resistance to ciliate grazing) for:
    • 16 Random clones isolated from 8, 28, and 60 days for each prey/predator/dilution combination
    • Measure OD600 after 48 and 96 hours of growth with and without consumer

4 Availability

Data and code in this GitHub repository (https://github.com/slhogle/hambiDoubleEvo) is provided under GNU AGPL3. Feel free to use or remix as you see fit. The rendered project site is available at https://slhogle.github.io/hambiDoubleEvo/, which has been produced using Quarto notebooks. The content on the rendered site is released under the CC BY 4.0. This repository hosts all code and data for this project including the code necessary to fully recreate the rendered webpage.

Raw sequencing data using in the project is available from NCBI Bioproject PRJNA1179357.

5 Reproducibility

The project uses renv to create reproducible environment to execute the code in this project. See here for a brief overview on collaboration and reproduction of the entire project. To get up and running you can do:

install.packages("renv")
renv::restore()

Reuse

Citation

BibTeX citation:
@online{l_hogle2025,
  author = {L Hogle, Shane and Hoffmann, Julius},
  title = {Data Analysis for the Project {hambiDoubleEvo}},
  volume = {28},
  number = {1},
  date = {2025-03-11},
  doi = {10.1111/ele.70033},
  langid = {en},
  abstract = {Evolutionary change within community members and shifts in
    species composition via species sorting contribute to community and
    trait dynamics. However, we do not understand when and how both
    processes contribute to community dynamics. Here, we estimated the
    contributions of species sorting and evolution over time (60 days)
    in bacterial communities of 24 species under selection by a ciliate
    predator. We found that species sorting contributed to increased
    community carrying capacity, while evolution contributed to
    decreased anti-predator defences. The relative roles of both
    processes changed over time, and our analysis indicates that if
    initial trait variation was in the direction of selection, species
    sorting prevailed, otherwise evolution drove phenotypic change.
    Furthermore, community composition, population densities and genomic
    evolution were affected by phenotypic match–mismatch combinations of
    predator and prey evolutionary history. Overall, our findings help
    to integrate when and how ecological and evolutionary processes
    structure communities.}
}
For attribution, please cite this work as:
L Hogle, Shane, and Julius Hoffmann. 2025. “Data Analysis for the Project hambiDoubleEvo.” Ecology Letters. March 11, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70033.